![]() I'm a little disappointed, as it's twice the price we paid for the TP-Links 4 years ago, and only twice the performance.Ĭode: Select all /interface> monitor-traffic aggregate,ether2,ether6,ether11,ether12 Would I was better off by going with the CCR1009? Shouldn't the 2.5Gbps speed be full-duplex? 2.5 both ways, same time? I've tried again after several hours, and now the speed gets to 975.4Mbps on both ways, but the lost packets increase dramatically. ![]() If I do both, the speed is capped at ~650Mbps. We are having at each location 1Gbps WAN speeds, so the TP-Link 350Mbps was a limiting factor.īut I tested now two RB1100AHx4 connected together (same port on both, ip addresses on each interface) with the bandwidth test provided by RouterOS interface, and for receive or transmit, individually, I get almost 1Gbps (975,4Mbps). So I could achieve the theoretical maximum of 1Gbps of the port speed connection. ![]() ![]() My main point for choosing the RB1100AHx4 was the idea that it could support 2.5Gbps throughput on one port. I bought 3x RB1100AHx4 Dude Edition routers to replace some TP-Link TL6120 in each of our 3 offices locations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |